2 Comments

  1. Ned Newitt says:

    It would be good to have a picture of an actual Smith House, not some generic illustration. What was the floor space of a Smith House? I guess they would have conformed to the Ministry’s standards in the 1940s, but the Smith houses in Leicester were built in 1954 when Macmillan had reduced space standards. You do not mention the method of construction which required a gantry.

    1. Smith Houses, developed post-World War II, were a type of prefabricated housing in the UK, specifically designed to address the housing shortage. You are correct that the space standards were influenced by changing government policies, with the 1944 Dudley Committee setting earlier guidelines, but by 1954, when the Smith Houses in Leicester were built, the standards had been reduced under Harold Macmillan’s housing initiatives. These policies led to a focus on quantity over space, and the size of Smith Houses was notably smaller than their earlier counterparts.

      Floor Space of a Smith House

      The typical floor space for a Smith House built under these post-1951 reduced standards was around 850 to 1,000 square feet (approximately 79 to 93 square meters). This floor space varied depending on the number of bedrooms (usually two or three) and the layout. These homes were modest but aimed to provide sufficient space for a growing family, albeit with smaller room dimensions compared to homes built immediately after the war.

      Construction Method

      The construction of Smith Houses involved a steel frame, clad with prefabricated concrete panels. This process was part of a broader trend in the 1940s and 1950s toward system-built housing, where sections of the home were manufactured offsite and assembled onsite. The use of a gantry system in the construction process was a significant feature of Smith Houses. Gantries were essentially large, mobile cranes used to hoist and position the prefabricated panels into place. These panels were often heavy and large, requiring mechanical assistance for accurate placement.

      In particular, the gantry system was crucial in speeding up the construction process, as it enabled rapid assembly of the house frame and cladding. Once the steel framework was erected, the concrete panels could be slotted into position, significantly reducing the time and labour required compared to traditional brick-and-mortar construction.

      Ministry of Housing Standards and Reduction

      When the first Smith Houses were developed, they likely adhered to the standards set by the Ministry of Housing in the 1940s. These earlier standards provided larger living spaces and rooms. However, as you mentioned, by the time the Leicester Smith Houses were built in 1954, Harold Macmillan’s policies had reduced space standards in a bid to meet the ambitious target of building 300,000 homes annually. This reduction in space resulted in smaller room dimensions and more compact overall layouts, but the homes still adhered to the essential functional and aesthetic requirements.

      Typical Construction Characteristics of Smith Houses

      Roof: The roof of a Smith House typically comprised a lightweight structure covered with tiles or sometimes asbestos sheeting. The lightweight nature of the roof was necessary due to the prefabricated design and the need for quick assembly.

      Walls

      : Smith Houses were characterised by their non-traditional walls made of prefabricated concrete panels. These panels were often reinforced with steel mesh for added structural integrity. The cladding system was designed to fit around the steel frame, and while this provided a fast construction method, it led to long-term durability issues due to poor insulation and water ingress.

      Floors

      : The floors were usually of a solid concrete construction at ground level, with timber joists supporting the upper floor in two-storey versions. Insulation was minimal, and over time, these concrete floors could suffer from cracks and moisture-related issues.

      Typical Defects in Smith Houses

      Concrete Spalling and Corrosion: One of the main issues with Smith Houses, particularly in later years, was concrete spalling—where the concrete panels begin to degrade, crack, and lose chunks of material. This is often caused by corrosion of the steel mesh reinforcement inside the panels, which expands as it rusts, leading to cracks in the surrounding concrete.

      Poor Insulation

      : Smith Houses were built before modern insulation standards were introduced, meaning they suffer from poor thermal performance. Many were cold and damp, with condensation problems exacerbated by the concrete construction, which does not breathe like traditional brick.

      Water Ingress

      : The panel construction was vulnerable to water ingress, particularly at the joints between panels. Over time, water penetration could lead to damp problems inside the house, contributing to mould growth and structural deterioration.

      Foundation Movement

      : Smith Houses, like many post-war prefabricated homes, were often built on simple, shallow foundations. This could lead to subsidence issues, particularly in areas with poor soil conditions.

      Classification Under Defective Premises Act

      Smith Houses, while not explicitly listed under the Housing Defects Act 1984, were considered substandard due to their construction type. Many fell into disrepair due to the typical defects mentioned above. However, under the Defective Premises Act, homeowners or occupiers could seek remedies if it was proven that their home posed a health and safety risk due to its defective construction. The main concerns with Smith Houses revolved around the degradation of the concrete panels and the structural issues arising from steel corrosion, making them liable under this legislation in some cases.

      Notes for Surveyors

      When surveying a Smith House, particular attention should be paid to:

      Condition of concrete panels:

      Check for visible signs of spalling, cracking, or reinforcement corrosion.

      Insulation and dampness:

      Inspect for condensation, poor insulation, and water ingress at the panel joints.

      Roof structure:

      Look for sagging, degradation of tiles, or problems related to lightweight construction.

      Subsidence:

      Check for evidence of foundation movement or settlement.
      Surveyors assessing these homes for prospective buyers should inform them of the long-term maintenance costs and potential structural risks associated with these properties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *